Evaluation Criteria
PURPOSE
The priority of the organization embraces a social problem (orvarious problems), and can be linked to one or more of the SDG's.
INNOVATION
The organization has an innovative approach for creating social impact and can easily prove this.
RESULTS
The organization can clearly identify the impact, measure it and show a proventrack record of results.
GOVERNANCE
There is a clear direction / vision of the organization to solve a social problem. The social goal is clearly lived through and identifiable within the organization.
LOCATION
The social enterprise's HQ is located in Belgium. The impact can be generated in Belgium or abroad.
Evaluation Committee
Belgium Impact counts on an evaluation committee from a broad set of sectors, backgrounds and experiences. This way, the platform can look from multiple facets into the activities of a social enterprise.
Perrine De Le Court
Prof. Dr. Nikolay A. Dentchev
Philippe Eiselein
Evaluation process
After a first submission round, all jury members evaluate the cases and come back with a preliminary answer. Based on this, the entrepreneur may receive a go/no-go/still discussing message within 4 weeks' time.
If the case is still to be discussed, the second round of discussion within the evaluation committee will take place, and the entrepreneur might be invited to submit more information to help guide the decision-making process.
SUBMISSION
FIRST ROUND
PRELIMINARY RESULT
SECOND ROUND
FINAL DECISION
.png){kind=logo}